IXN vs VOO
iShares Global Tech ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, IXN or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. IXN led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IXN | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.37% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $9.5B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.78% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 145 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +33.17%Best | +11.55% |
| 1Y Return | +44.50%Best | +17.54% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +33.01%Best | +20.71% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +19.51%Best | +12.80% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.9% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -36.3% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $24,379Best | $18,262 |
| Top 10 Weight | 60.5% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 12, 2001 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 10, 2026 (16 years).
IXN vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
IXN vs VOO Performance
iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IXN returned +44.50% while VOO returned +17.54%. Year to date, IXN is up 33.17% versus a gain of 11.55% for VOO.
Over three years, IXN compounded at +33.01% per year against +20.71% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +19.51% and +12.80% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, IXN has the edge at +19.28% annualized vs +13.35%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IXN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.9% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.3% for IXN and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IXN charges 0.37% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $37 vs $3 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IXN currently yields 0.78% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
75.2% of IXN's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 37.8% of VOO's money is in holdings IXN also owns.
Most of IXN is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
72 positions in common, counted across the 128 positions we hold weights for in IXN and 505 in VOO, against full books of 145 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 424 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for IXN (61.6% of the fund), and 4 for IXN that do not appear in VOO (1.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IXN | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 13.09% | 7.51% | 5.58% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 12.69% | 6.59% | 6.10% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 7.94% | 4.30% | 3.64% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.89% | 2.77% | 2.12% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.08% | 2.02% | 2.06% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 3.31% | 1.47% | 1.84% |
| INTCIntel Corp. | 2.12% | 1.02% | 1.10% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 1.73% | 0.89% | 0.84% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 1.61% | 0.84% | 0.77% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.66% | 0.72% | 0.94% |
75.2% of IXN is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IXN or VOO?
IXN has an expense ratio of 0.37% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $34 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IXN or VOO?
Over the past year IXN returned +44.50% vs +17.54% for VOO, so IXN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), IXN annualized +19.28% vs +13.35% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IXN or VOO?
IXN has been the more volatile fund at 18.9% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: IXN -36.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both IXN and VOO?
IXN and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IXN and VOO?
75.2% of IXN's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 37.8% of VOO's is in holdings IXN also owns. They hold 72 positions in common, counted across the 128 positions we hold weights for in IXN and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, IXN or VOO?
IXN yields 0.78% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than IXN?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. IXN led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.