JGRW vs VYM
Jensen Quality Growth ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, JGRW or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JGRW | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.57% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $74M | $83.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.37% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 29 | 608 |
| YTD Return | +3.05% | +10.00%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.48% | +13.75%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.63% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.2% | 10.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -14.6% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $10,902 | $13,605Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 58.6% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Jensen Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Aug 13, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 13, 2024 to Oct 2, 2026 (2.1 years).
JGRW vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.
JGRW vs VYM Performance
Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW) is an ETF from Jensen Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year JGRW returned +1.48% while VYM returned +13.75%. Year to date, JGRW is up 3.05% versus a gain of 10.00% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JGRW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.2% compared with 10.7% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.6% for JGRW and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JGRW charges 0.57% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $4 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JGRW currently yields 0.37% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
21.0% of JGRW's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 11.0% of VYM's money is in holdings JGRW also owns.
JGRW and VYM share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, JGRW as of Sep 15, 2026 and VYM as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
7 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in JGRW and 557 in VYM, against full books of 29 and 608.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 521 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for JGRW (86.0% of the fund), and 21 for JGRW that do not appear in VYM (79.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in JGRW | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.42% | 7.35% | 2.93% |
| MMCMarsh & Mclennan Cos Inc Common Stock Usd 1 | 4.56% | 0.37% | 4.19% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 3.01% | 1.37% | 1.64% |
| WMWaste Mgmt | 3.72% | 0.34% | 3.38% |
| ABTAbbott Laboratories | 2.14% | 0.74% | 1.40% |
| MCDMcdonald'S Corp | 1.40% | 0.78% | 0.62% |
| BRBroadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. | 1.76% | 0.07% | 1.69% |
21.0% of JGRW is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JGRW or VYM?
JGRW has an expense ratio of 0.57% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $53 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, JGRW or VYM?
Over the past year JGRW returned +1.48% vs +13.75% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), JGRW annualized +4.20% vs +15.79% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, JGRW or VYM?
JGRW has been the more volatile fund at 11.2% annualized versus 10.7% for VYM. Worst drawdown: JGRW -14.6% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both JGRW and VYM?
JGRW and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between JGRW and VYM?
21.0% of JGRW's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 11.0% of VYM's is in holdings JGRW also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in JGRW and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, JGRW or VYM?
JGRW yields 0.37% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than JGRW?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.