JGRW vs VOO
Jensen Quality Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, JGRW or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JGRW | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.57% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $87M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.37% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 30 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +3.24% | +14.14%Best |
| 1Y Return | +0.86% | +17.31%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.63% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.3%Best | 12.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.6%Best | -18.7% |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $10,935 | $14,642Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.7% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Jensen Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 13, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 13, 2024 to Sep 22, 2026 (2.1 years).
JGRW vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.
JGRW vs VOO Performance
Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW) is an ETF from Jensen Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year JGRW returned +0.86% while VOO returned +17.31%. Year to date, JGRW is up 3.24% versus a gain of 14.14% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.3% compared with 11.3% for JGRW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.6% for JGRW and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JGRW charges 0.57% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $3 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JGRW currently yields 0.37% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
99.0% of JGRW's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 35.6% of VOO's money is in holdings JGRW also owns.
Most of JGRW is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
27 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in JGRW and 494 in VOO, against full books of 30 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 28 and 494 positions we hold weights for.
VOO holds 460 positions JGRW does not, 63.6% of the fund.
Largest: GOOG 2.62%, META 1.90%, JPM 1.46%, BRK.B 1.46%, MU 1.44%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in JGRW | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 6.34% | 7.55% | 1.21% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.40% | 7.05% | 0.65% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 7.99% | 5.36% | 2.63% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 7.28% | 4.13% | 3.15% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 6.34% | 3.24% | 3.10% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.34% | 2.86% | 1.48% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 5.31% | 0.72% | 4.59% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 4.58% | 1.41% | 3.17% |
| MMCMarsh & Mclennan Cos Inc Common Stock Usd 1 | 4.68% | 0.14% | 4.54% |
| SHWSherwin Williams Co/the | 4.42% | 0.12% | 4.30% |
99.0% of JGRW is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JGRW or VOO?
JGRW has an expense ratio of 0.57% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $54 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, JGRW or VOO?
Over the past year JGRW returned +0.86% vs +17.31% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), JGRW annualized +4.35% vs +19.91% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, JGRW or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 12.3% annualized versus 11.3% for JGRW. Worst drawdown: JGRW -14.6% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both JGRW and VOO?
JGRW and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between JGRW and VOO?
99.0% of JGRW's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 35.6% of VOO's is in holdings JGRW also owns. They hold 27 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in JGRW and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, JGRW or VOO?
JGRW yields 0.37% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than JGRW?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.