IVV vs JGRW
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Jensen Quality Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | JGRW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.57% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $90M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.37% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 30 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +5.33% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | +5.52% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 11.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -14.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Jensen Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 13, 2024 |
IVV vs JGRW Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW) is a ETF from Jensen Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while JGRW returned +5.52%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a gain of 5.33% for JGRW.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.3% for JGRW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -14.6% for JGRW. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while JGRW charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $57 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.37% for JGRW.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and JGRW share 28 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 33.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or JGRW?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JGRW charges 0.57%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $54 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or JGRW?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs +5.52% for JGRW, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs +5.59% for JGRW. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or JGRW?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.3% for JGRW. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs JGRW -14.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and JGRW?
IVV and JGRW have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and JGRW?
IVV and JGRW share 28 common holdings with a 33.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JGRW?
IVV yields 1.10% while JGRW yields 0.37%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.