IVV vs JGRW
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Jensen Quality Growth ETF
Which is better, IVV or JGRW?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | JGRW |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.57% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $87M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.37% |
| Holdings | 508 | 30 |
| YTD Return | +12.39%Best | +2.06% |
| 1Y Return | +16.61%Best | +0.96% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.4% | 11.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -14.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $14,445Best | $10,815 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 57.7% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Jensen Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 13, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 13, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.1 years).
IVV vs JGRW growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.
IVV vs JGRW Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW) is an ETF from Jensen Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while JGRW returned +0.96%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 2.06% for JGRW.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.4% compared with 11.5% for JGRW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -14.6% for JGRW. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while JGRW charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $57 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.37% for JGRW.
Holdings Overlap
35.5% of IVV's money is in holdings JGRW also owns. 99.0% of JGRW's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of JGRW is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
27 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 28 in JGRW, against full books of 508 and 30.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 490 and 28 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 455 positions JGRW does not, 63.1% of the fund.
Largest: GOOG 2.39%, META 1.90%, MU 1.63%, TSLA 1.56%, JPM 1.44%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in JGRW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 6.34% | 1.73% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 7.99% | 2.30% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.02% | 6.40% | 0.62% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.84% | 7.28% | 3.44% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.00% | 6.34% | 3.34% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 4.34% | 1.69% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 0.72% | 5.31% | 4.59% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.38% | 4.58% | 3.20% |
| MMCMarsh & Mclennan Cos Inc Common Stock Usd 1 | 0.14% | 4.68% | 4.54% |
| SHWSherwin Williams Co/the | 0.12% | 4.42% | 4.30% |
99.0% of JGRW is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or JGRW?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JGRW charges 0.57%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $54 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or JGRW?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +0.96% for JGRW, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +19.14% vs +3.80% for JGRW. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or JGRW?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.4% annualized versus 11.5% for JGRW. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs JGRW -14.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and JGRW?
IVV and JGRW have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and JGRW?
99.0% of JGRW's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 99.0% of JGRW's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 27 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 28 in JGRW.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JGRW?
IVV yields 1.06% while JGRW yields 0.37%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is JGRW better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.