JMOM vs VOO
JPMorgan US Momentum Factor ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, JMOM or VOO?
Nearly the same fund. VOO costs less.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. JMOM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. JMOM is less concentrated, with 19.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JMOM | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.12% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.6B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.74% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 297 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +20.89%Best | +12.23% |
| 1Y Return | +25.26%Best | +18.60% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.94%Best | +20.98% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.60%Best | +12.76% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.5% | 16.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3%Tie | -34.3%Tie |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,919Best | $18,230 |
| Top 10 Weight | 19.0%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 8, 2017 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 9, 2017 to Sep 9, 2026 (8.8 years).
JMOM vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.8 years both funds cover.
JMOM vs VOO Performance
JPMorgan US Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year JMOM returned +25.26% while VOO returned +18.60%. Year to date, JMOM is up 20.89% versus a gain of 12.23% for VOO.
Over three years, JMOM compounded at +25.94% per year against +20.98% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +13.60% and +12.76% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, JMOM has the edge at +15.29% annualized vs +14.05%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JMOM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.5% compared with 16.3% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for JMOM and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JMOM charges 0.12% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $12 vs $3 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JMOM currently yields 0.74% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
75.4% of JMOM's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 64.1% of VOO's money is in holdings JMOM also owns.
Most of JMOM is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 62 days apart, JMOM as of Aug 31, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
151 positions in common, counted across the 288 positions we hold weights for in JMOM and 505 in VOO, against full books of 297 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 345 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for JMOM (35.3% of the fund), and 123 for JMOM that do not appear in VOO (20.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in JMOM | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 2.17% | 7.51% | 5.34% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.07% | 6.59% | 4.52% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 2.12% | 4.30% | 2.18% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 1.91% | 3.25% | 1.34% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.96% | 2.77% | 0.81% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 0.59% | 3.62% | 3.03% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.97% | 2.02% | 0.05% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 1.57% | 1.92% | 0.35% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 1.86% | 1.47% | 0.39% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 1.93% | 0.95% | 0.98% |
75.4% of JMOM is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JMOM or VOO?
JMOM has an expense ratio of 0.12% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, JMOM or VOO?
Over the past year JMOM returned +25.26% vs +18.60% for VOO, so JMOM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), JMOM annualized +15.29% vs +14.05% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, JMOM or VOO?
JMOM has been the more volatile fund at 17.5% annualized versus 16.3% for VOO. Worst drawdown: JMOM -34.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both JMOM and VOO?
JMOM and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between JMOM and VOO?
75.4% of JMOM's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 64.1% of VOO's is in holdings JMOM also owns. They hold 151 positions in common, counted across the 288 positions we hold weights for in JMOM and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, JMOM or VOO?
JMOM yields 0.74% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than JMOM?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. JMOM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. JMOM is less concentrated, with 19.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.