JPUS vs VTI
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JPUS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $459M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.25% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 377 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +17.41% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.75% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.11% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.20% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -38.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 29, 2015 | May 24, 2001 |
JPUS vs VTI Performance
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year JPUS returned +21.75% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, JPUS is up 17.41% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, JPUS compounded at +16.11% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.20% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, JPUS has the edge at +11.40% annualized vs +8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 15.1% for JPUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.7% for JPUS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JPUS charges 0.18% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $3 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JPUS currently yields 2.25% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
JPUS and VTI share 310 holdings out of 2844 unique holdings combined, representing a 24.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JPUS or VTI?
JPUS has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, JPUS or VTI?
Over the past year JPUS returned +21.75% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), JPUS annualized +11.40% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, JPUS or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 15.1% for JPUS. Worst drawdown: JPUS -38.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both JPUS and VTI?
JPUS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between JPUS and VTI?
JPUS and VTI share 310 common holdings with a 24.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2844 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, JPUS or VTI?
JPUS yields 2.25% while VTI yields 1.07%, so JPUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.