JVAL vs VTI
JPMorgan US Value Factor ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, JVAL or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. JVAL led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VTI over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. JVAL is less concentrated, with 17.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JVAL | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.12% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $952M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.60% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 399 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +19.78%Best | +11.53% |
| 1Y Return | +26.53%Best | +15.74% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.83%Best | +20.67% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.47%Best | +11.59% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.2% | 16.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -40.4% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,996Best | $17,303 |
| Top 10 Weight | 17.3%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 8, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 9, 2017 to Sep 15, 2026 (8.8 years).
JVAL vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.8 years both funds cover.
JVAL vs VTI Performance
JPMorgan US Value Factor ETF (JVAL) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year JVAL returned +26.53% while VTI returned +15.74%. Year to date, JVAL is up 19.78% versus a gain of 11.53% for VTI.
Over three years, JVAL compounded at +20.83% per year against +20.67% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.47% and +11.59% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.38% annualized vs +11.74%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JVAL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.2% compared with 16.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.4% for JVAL and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JVAL charges 0.12% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $12 vs $3 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JVAL currently yields 1.60% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
96.8% of JVAL's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 48.4% of VTI's money is in holdings JVAL also owns.
Most of JVAL is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
373 positions in common, counted across the 390 positions we hold weights for in JVAL and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 399 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 803 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for JVAL (49.2% of the fund), and 9 for JVAL that do not appear in VTI (1.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in JVAL | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.06% | 6.29% | 4.23% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 1.85% | 6.40% | 4.55% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.23% | 4.79% | 2.56% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 1.85% | 2.90% | 1.05% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.77% | 2.56% | 0.79% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.74% | 1.70% | 0.04% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.92% | 1.29% | 0.63% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.64% | 0.86% | 0.78% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 0.59% | 1.08% | 0.49% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 1.16% | 0.50% | 0.66% |
96.8% of JVAL is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JVAL or VTI?
JVAL has an expense ratio of 0.12% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, JVAL or VTI?
Over the past year JVAL returned +26.53% vs +15.74% for VTI, so JVAL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), JVAL annualized +11.74% vs +13.38% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, JVAL or VTI?
JVAL has been the more volatile fund at 18.2% annualized versus 16.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: JVAL -40.4% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both JVAL and VTI?
JVAL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between JVAL and VTI?
96.8% of JVAL's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 48.4% of VTI's is in holdings JVAL also owns. They hold 373 positions in common, counted across the 390 positions we hold weights for in JVAL and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, JVAL or VTI?
JVAL yields 1.60% while VTI yields 1.03%, so JVAL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than JVAL?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. JVAL led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VTI over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. JVAL is less concentrated, with 17.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.