KARS vs VOO
KARS vs VOO
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. KARS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KARS | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $76M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.18% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 87 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -1.37% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.77% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -0.50% | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -7.14% | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -64.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 18, 2018 | Sep 7, 2010 |
KARS vs VOO Performance
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) is a ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KARS returned +25.77% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, KARS is down 1.37% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Over three years, KARS compounded at -0.50% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -7.14% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +3.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KARS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -64.8% for KARS and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KARS charges 0.72% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $3 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KARS currently yields 0.18% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KARS or VOO?
KARS has an expense ratio of 0.72% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $69 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KARS or VOO?
Over the past year KARS returned +25.77% vs +23.71% for VOO, so KARS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), KARS annualized +3.94% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KARS or VOO?
KARS has been the more volatile fund at 28.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: KARS -64.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both KARS and VOO?
KARS and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KARS and VOO?
KARS and VOO share 2 common holdings with a 1.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 582 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KARS or VOO?
KARS yields 0.18% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.