KVLE vs VTI
KraneShares Value Line Dynamic Dividend Equity Index ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, KVLE or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KVLE | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $42M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 7.46% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 84 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +13.67%Best | +12.34% |
| 1Y Return | +14.57% | +18.37%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.80% | +20.62%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.27% | +11.68%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.6%Best | 15.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.4%Best | -25.4% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,304 | $17,373Best |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 24, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 24, 2020 to Sep 9, 2026 (5.8 years).
KVLE vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.8 years both funds cover.
KVLE vs VTI Performance
KraneShares Value Line Dynamic Dividend Equity Index ETF (KVLE) is an ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KVLE returned +14.57% while VTI returned +18.37%. Year to date, KVLE is up 13.67% versus a gain of 12.34% for VTI.
Over three years, KVLE compounded at +15.80% per year against +20.62% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.27% and +11.68% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +14.24% annualized vs +12.49%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 13.6% for KVLE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for KVLE and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KVLE charges 0.56% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $3 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KVLE currently yields 7.46% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 91.2% of KVLE's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of KVLE is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 62 days apart, KVLE as of Aug 31, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
76 positions in common, counted across the 83 positions we hold weights for in KVLE and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 84 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in KVLE | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 6.48% | 6.32% | 0.16% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 3.96% | 3.81% | 0.15% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.81% | 5.84% | 4.03% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.69% | 2.46% | 0.23% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.98% | 1.79% | 0.19% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 2.06% | 1.11% | 0.95% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.89% | 0.61% | 1.28% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.86% | 0.57% | 1.29% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 0.14% | 2.27% | 2.13% |
| GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc. | 1.89% | 0.39% | 1.50% |
91.2% of KVLE is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KVLE or VTI?
KVLE has an expense ratio of 0.56% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $53 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, KVLE or VTI?
Over the past year KVLE returned +14.57% vs +18.37% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), KVLE annualized +12.49% vs +14.24% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, KVLE or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 13.6% for KVLE. Worst drawdown: KVLE -18.4% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both KVLE and VTI?
KVLE and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between KVLE and VTI?
At least 91.2% of KVLE's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 76 positions in common, counted across the 83 positions we hold weights for in KVLE and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, KVLE or VTI?
KVLE yields 7.46% while VTI yields 1.03%, so KVLE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than KVLE?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.