KVLE vs VTI
KraneShares Value Line Dynamic Dividend Equity Index ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KVLE | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $43M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.46% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 84 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +16.55% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.00% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.66% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.71% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.7% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 24, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
KVLE vs VTI Performance
KraneShares Value Line Dynamic Dividend Equity Index ETF (KVLE) is a ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KVLE returned +19.00% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, KVLE is up 16.55% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, KVLE compounded at +16.66% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.71% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, KVLE has the edge at +13.15% annualized vs +8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 13.7% for KVLE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for KVLE and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KVLE charges 0.56% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $3 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KVLE currently yields 7.46% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
KVLE and VTI share 6 holdings out of 2787 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KVLE or VTI?
KVLE has an expense ratio of 0.56% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $53 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KVLE or VTI?
Over the past year KVLE returned +19.00% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), KVLE annualized +13.15% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KVLE or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 13.7% for KVLE. Worst drawdown: KVLE -18.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both KVLE and VTI?
KVLE and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between KVLE and VTI?
KVLE and VTI share 6 common holdings with a 6.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2787 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KVLE or VTI?
KVLE yields 7.46% while VTI yields 1.07%, so KVLE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.