LCLG vs VOO
Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. LCLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LCLG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $111M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 57 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +12.18% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.50% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.95% | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -25.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Logan Capital | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 8, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
LCLG vs VOO Performance
Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF (LCLG) is a ETF from Logan Capital and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LCLG returned +21.50% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, LCLG is up 12.18% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, LCLG compounded at +25.95% per year against +21.79% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, LCLG has the edge at +21.27% annualized vs +13.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LCLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.9% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.8% for LCLG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LCLG charges 0.90% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $3 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LCLG currently yields 0.00% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
LCLG and VOO share 38 holdings out of 523 unique holdings combined, representing a 26.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LCLG or VOO?
LCLG has an expense ratio of 0.90% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $87 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LCLG or VOO?
Over the past year LCLG returned +21.50% vs +20.92% for VOO, so LCLG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), LCLG annualized +21.27% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LCLG or VOO?
LCLG has been the more volatile fund at 19.9% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: LCLG -25.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both LCLG and VOO?
LCLG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between LCLG and VOO?
LCLG and VOO share 38 common holdings with a 26.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 523 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LCLG or VOO?
LCLG yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.