LCLG vs VOO

LCLG vs VOO

Which is better, LCLG or VOO?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. LCLG led over 3Y and the full window, VOO over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.0%.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricLCLGVOO
Expense Ratio0.90%0.03%Best
AUM$105M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.04%
Holdings57509
YTD Return+8.92%+11.55%Best
1Y Return+11.35%+17.54%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+24.22%Best+20.71%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.80%
Volatility (annualized)19.8%14.2%Best
Max Drawdown-25.8%-18.7%Best
$10,000 over 4.1 years$21,168Best$19,446
Top 10 Weight44.0%36.4%Best
Fund FamilyLogan CapitalVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionAug 8, 2022Sep 7, 2010

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 8, 2022 to Sep 10, 2026 (4.1 years).

LCLG vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.1 years both funds cover.

LCLG vs VOO Performance

Logan Capital Large Cap Growth ETF (LCLG) is an ETF from Logan Capital and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LCLG returned +11.35% while VOO returned +17.54%. Year to date, LCLG is up 8.92% versus a gain of 11.55% for VOO.

Over three years, LCLG compounded at +24.22% per year against +20.71% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, LCLG has the edge at +20.07% annualized vs +17.61%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

LCLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.8% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.8% for LCLG and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

LCLG charges 0.90% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $3 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LCLG currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

LCLG already in VOO78.8%
VOO already in LCLG28.5%

78.8% of LCLG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 28.5% of VOO's money is in holdings LCLG also owns.

Most of LCLG is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

The two holdings books were reported 48 days apart, LCLG as of Aug 17, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

39 positions in common, counted across the 56 positions we hold weights for in LCLG and 505 in VOO, against full books of 57 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 457 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for LCLG (70.9% of the fund), and 15 for LCLG that do not appear in VOO (19.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in LCLGWeight in VOODifference
AAPLApple, Inc4.44%6.59%2.15%
AVGOBroadcom Inc4.87%2.77%2.10%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.91%3.62%0.29%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.5.41%2.02%3.39%
GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.0013.60%3.25%0.35%
APHAmphenol Corp. Class A5.74%0.34%5.40%
KLACKla Corp.4.75%0.61%4.14%
GOOGAlphabet Inc2.49%2.59%0.10%
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.3.04%1.92%1.12%
MAMastercard Inc3.50%0.64%2.86%

78.8% of LCLG is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

LCLGVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, LCLG or VOO?

LCLG has an expense ratio of 0.90% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $87 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, LCLG or VOO?

Over the past year LCLG returned +11.35% vs +17.54% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), LCLG annualized +20.07% vs +17.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, LCLG or VOO?

LCLG has been the more volatile fund at 19.8% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: LCLG -25.8% vs VOO -18.7%.

Should I hold both LCLG and VOO?

LCLG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between LCLG and VOO?

78.8% of LCLG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 28.5% of VOO's is in holdings LCLG also owns. They hold 39 positions in common, counted across the 56 positions we hold weights for in LCLG and 505 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, LCLG or VOO?

LCLG yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than LCLG?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. LCLG led over 3Y and the full window, VOO over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.