LGDS vs QQQ

LGDS vs QQQ

Which is better, LGDS or QQQ?

QQQ has been ahead.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. QQQ is less concentrated, with 47.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns (1Y): QQQLess Concentrated: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricLGDSQQQ
Expense Ratio0.30%0.18%Best
AUM$1.1B$498.6B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.42%
Holdings206321
YTD Return+5.30%+24.01%Best
1Y Return-+25.94%
3Y Return (annualized)-+28.16%
5Y Return (annualized)-+16.56%
Top 10 Weight57.2%47.2%Best
Fund FamilyJ.P. Morgan Asset ManagementInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJul 10, 2026Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

LGDS vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

LGDS vs QQQ Performance

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Growth ETF (LGDS) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, LGDS is up 5.30% versus a gain of 24.01% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

LGDS charges 0.30% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $18 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LGDS currently yields 0.00% against 0.42% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

LGDS already in QQQ70.9%
QQQ already in LGDS72.8%

70.9% of LGDS's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 72.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings LGDS also owns.

Most of QQQ is already inside LGDS. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

37 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in LGDS and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 206 and 321.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 60 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for LGDS (25.6% of the fund), and 60 for LGDS that do not appear in QQQ (27.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in LGDSWeight in QQQDifference
NVDANvidia Corp15.96%8.45%7.51%
AAPLApple, Inc7.65%7.80%0.15%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A8.69%3.15%5.54%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp4.90%5.88%0.98%
AVGOBroadcom Inc4.48%2.74%1.74%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc3.49%3.71%0.22%
METAMeta Platforms Inc3.91%3.07%0.84%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.2.09%4.85%2.76%
TSLATesla Inc2.86%2.92%0.06%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C2.80%2.93%0.13%

72.8% of QQQ is already inside LGDS.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

LGDSQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, LGDS or QQQ?

LGDS has an expense ratio of 0.30% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between LGDS and QQQ?

72.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings LGDS also owns. 72.8% of QQQ's is in holdings LGDS also owns. They hold 37 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in LGDS and 102 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, LGDS or QQQ?

LGDS yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than LGDS?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. QQQ is less concentrated, with 47.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.