LGDX vs ZIG
Intech S&P Large Cap Diversified Alpha ETF vs The Acquirers Fund ETF
Which is better, LGDX or ZIG?
Each has led over a different period.
LGDX has a lower expense ratio. LGDX led over the full window, ZIG over 1Y. ZIG is less concentrated, with 35.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LGDX | ZIG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $136M | $32M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.48% | 1.68% |
| Holdings | 593 | 67 |
| YTD Return | +5.09% | +8.83%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.85% | +14.36%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.43% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +7.98% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.9%Best | 14.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.8%Best | -18.4% |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $11,969Best | $11,112 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.6% | 35.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Intech ETF | Acquirers Funds, LLC |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 1, 2025 | May 14, 2019 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 28, 2025 to Nov 6, 2026 (1.7 years).
LGDX vs ZIG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
LGDX vs ZIG Performance
Intech S&P Large Cap Diversified Alpha ETF (LGDX) is an ETF from Intech ETF and The Acquirers Fund ETF (ZIG) is an ETF from Acquirers Funds, LLC. Over the past year LGDX returned +7.85% while ZIG returned +14.36%. Year to date, LGDX is up 5.09% versus a gain of 8.83% for ZIG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ZIG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 12.9% for LGDX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.8% for LGDX and -18.4% for ZIG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.28. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LGDX charges 0.25% per year while ZIG charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $75 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LGDX currently yields 0.48% against 1.68% for ZIG.
Holdings Overlap
2.3% of LGDX's money is in holdings ZIG also owns. 27.2% of ZIG's money is in holdings LGDX also owns.
ZIG and LGDX share little of their money.
9 positions in common, counted across the 295 positions we hold weights for in LGDX and 32 in ZIG, against full books of 593 and 67.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 23 positions for ZIG that do not appear in our book for LGDX (72.8% of the fund), and 282 for LGDX that do not appear in ZIG (97.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LGDX | Weight in ZIG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| EOGEog Resources Inc | 0.78% | 3.51% | 2.73% |
| TJXTjx Cos., Inc. | 0.26% | 3.69% | 3.43% |
| APAApa Corp | 0.25% | 3.54% | 3.29% |
| DECKDeckers Outdoor Corp | 0.18% | 3.57% | 3.39% |
| SYFSynchrony Financial | 0.21% | 3.29% | 3.08% |
| MOAltria Group Inc | 0.04% | 3.42% | 3.38% |
| BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc. | 0.22% | 3.11% | 2.89% |
| CFCf Industries Holdings Inc. | 0.16% | 3.01% | 2.85% |
| FGXXXFirst American Government Obligations Fund | 0.20% | 0.09% | 0.11% |
27.2% of ZIG is already inside LGDX.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LGDX or ZIG?
LGDX has an expense ratio of 0.25% while ZIG charges 0.75%. LGDX is the cheaper option, by $50 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LGDX or ZIG?
Over the past year LGDX returned +7.85% vs +14.36% for ZIG, so ZIG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LGDX annualized +11.15% vs +6.40% for ZIG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LGDX or ZIG?
ZIG has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 12.9% for LGDX. Worst drawdown: LGDX -15.8% vs ZIG -18.4%.
Should I hold both LGDX and ZIG?
LGDX and ZIG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.28, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LGDX and ZIG?
27.2% of ZIG's money is in holdings LGDX also owns. 27.2% of ZIG's is in holdings LGDX also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 295 positions we hold weights for in LGDX and 32 in ZIG.
Which pays a higher dividend, LGDX or ZIG?
LGDX yields 0.48% while ZIG yields 1.68%, so ZIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZIG better than LGDX?
LGDX has a lower expense ratio. LGDX led over the full window, ZIG over 1Y. ZIG is less concentrated, with 35.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.