LGDX vs VOO
Intech S&P Large Cap Diversified Alpha ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, LGDX or VOO?
Nearly the same fund. VOO costs less.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. LGDX is less concentrated, with 37.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LGDX | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $144M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 0.47% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 590 | 506 |
| YTD Return | +11.44% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.29% | +16.33%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.02% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.5%Best | 12.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.8%Best | -16.1% |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $12,691 | $13,245Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.4%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | Intech ETF | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 1, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 28, 2025 to Oct 2, 2026 (1.6 years).
LGDX vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
LGDX vs VOO Performance
Intech S&P Large Cap Diversified Alpha ETF (LGDX) is an ETF from Intech ETF and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LGDX returned +13.29% while VOO returned +16.33%. Year to date, LGDX is up 11.44% versus a gain of 13.59% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.8% compared with 12.5% for LGDX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.8% for LGDX and -16.1% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LGDX charges 0.25% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LGDX currently yields 0.47% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
99.4% of LGDX's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 83.6% of VOO's money is in holdings LGDX also owns.
Most of LGDX is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, LGDX as of Sep 15, 2026 and VOO as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
289 positions in common, counted across the 294 positions we hold weights for in LGDX and 494 in VOO, against full books of 590 and 506.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 199 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for LGDX (15.6% of the fund), and 4 for LGDX that do not appear in VOO (0.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LGDX | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.13% | 7.55% | 0.58% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.25% | 7.05% | 1.80% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.75% | 5.36% | 0.61% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 4.09% | 3.24% | 0.85% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.67% | 4.13% | 1.46% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.45% | 2.86% | 0.59% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 3.28% | 2.62% | 0.66% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.72% | 1.90% | 0.18% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.09% | 1.44% | 0.65% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.76% | 1.41% | 0.35% |
99.4% of LGDX is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LGDX or VOO?
LGDX has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LGDX or VOO?
Over the past year LGDX returned +13.29% vs +16.33% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LGDX annualized +16.06% vs +19.20% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LGDX or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 12.8% annualized versus 12.5% for LGDX. Worst drawdown: LGDX -15.8% vs VOO -16.1%.
Should I hold both LGDX and VOO?
LGDX and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LGDX and VOO?
99.4% of LGDX's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 83.6% of VOO's is in holdings LGDX also owns. They hold 289 positions in common, counted across the 294 positions we hold weights for in LGDX and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, LGDX or VOO?
LGDX yields 0.47% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than LGDX?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. LGDX is less concentrated, with 37.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.