LOEV vs QQQ

LOEV vs QQQ

Which is better, LOEV or QQQ?

LOEV has been ahead.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. LOEV led over 1Y. LOEV is less concentrated, with 35.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns (1Y): LOEVLess Concentrated: LOEV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricLOEVQQQ
Expense Ratio0.70%0.18%Best
AUM-$486.1B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.44%
Holdings54107
YTD Return+6.13%+17.54%Best
1Y Return-+25.59%
3Y Return (annualized)-+24.63%
5Y Return (annualized)-+14.18%
Top 10 Weight35.1%Best46.5%
Fund FamilyHarding LoevnerInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJul 20, 2026Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

LOEV vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

LOEV vs QQQ Performance

Harding Loevner International Developed Markets Select Equity ETF (LOEV) is an ETF from Harding Loevner and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, LOEV is up 6.13% versus a gain of 17.54% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

LOEV charges 0.70% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $18 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LOEV currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 44 holdings in LOEV and 102 in QQQ, totalling 99.0% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in LOEV and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 54 and 107.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 96 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for LOEV (97.5% of the fund), and 8 for LOEV that do not appear in QQQ (22.4%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of LOEV and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

LOEVQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, LOEV or QQQ?

LOEV has an expense ratio of 0.70% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which pays a higher dividend, LOEV or QQQ?

LOEV yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than LOEV?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. LOEV led over 1Y. LOEV is less concentrated, with 35.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.