LOEV vs VXUS
Harding Loevner International Developed Markets Select Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, LOEV or VXUS?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. LOEV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LOEV | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | - | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 54 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +4.67% | +13.44%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +21.98% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.89% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.16% |
| Fund Family | Harding Loevner | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 20, 2026 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
LOEV vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
LOEV vs VXUS Performance
Harding Loevner International Developed Markets Select Equity ETF (LOEV) is an ETF from Harding Loevner and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, LOEV is up 4.67% versus a gain of 13.44% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LOEV charges 0.70% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $5 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LOEV currently yields 0.00% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 53.0% of LOEV's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 88.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
24 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in LOEV and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 54 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LOEV | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHELShell Plc | 4.10% | 0.57% | 3.53% |
| ASML:ASASML HOLDING NV | 3.19% | 1.42% | 1.77% |
| 6098:JPRecruit Holdings Co. Ltd. Com Stk | 3.92% | 0.24% | 3.68% |
| MFC:CAManulife Financial Corporation | 3.43% | 0.17% | 3.26% |
| ROP:SMRoche Holding Ag Common Stock Chf.001 | 2.71% | 0.69% | 2.02% |
| 1299:HKAia Group Ltd | 3.07% | 0.24% | 2.83% |
| ATD:CAAlimentation Couche-tard Inc - Common Cl A | 3.09% | 0.11% | 2.98% |
| CNI:CACanadian Natl Railway Co | 2.92% | 0.15% | 2.77% |
| 6861:JPKeyence Corp | 2.38% | 0.21% | 2.17% |
| 6920:JPLasertec Corp | 2.53% | 0.04% | 2.49% |
53.0% of LOEV is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LOEV or VXUS?
LOEV has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $65 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between LOEV and VXUS?
At least 53.0% of LOEV's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 24 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in LOEV and 8,082 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, LOEV or VXUS?
LOEV yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than LOEV?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. LOEV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.