LSAT vs VOO
LeaderShares AlphaFactor Tactical Focused ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LSAT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $66M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.62% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 34 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +20.45% | +12.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.62% | +21.15% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.69% | +20.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.22% | +12.76% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | LeaderShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 26, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
LSAT vs VOO Performance
LeaderShares AlphaFactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) is a ETF from LeaderShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LSAT returned +14.62% while VOO returned +21.15%. Year to date, LSAT is up 20.45% versus a gain of 12.87% for VOO.
Over three years, LSAT compounded at +11.69% per year against +20.93% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +7.22% and +12.76% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, LSAT has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs +13.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LSAT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.5% for LSAT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LSAT charges 0.99% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $3 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LSAT currently yields 1.62% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
LSAT and VOO share 8 holdings out of 527 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LSAT or VOO?
LSAT has an expense ratio of 0.99% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $96 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LSAT or VOO?
Over the past year LSAT returned +14.62% vs +21.15% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), LSAT annualized +13.47% vs +13.46% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LSAT or VOO?
LSAT has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: LSAT -20.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both LSAT and VOO?
LSAT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LSAT and VOO?
LSAT and VOO share 8 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 527 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LSAT or VOO?
LSAT yields 1.62% while VOO yields 1.08%, so LSAT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.