LVDS vs QQQ
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. LVDS delivered stronger 1-year returns. LVDS offers more diversification with 132 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LVDS | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $113M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.42% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 132 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +21.83% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +29.62% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.3% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -6.6% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 11, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
LVDS vs QQQ Performance
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year LVDS returned +29.62% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, LVDS is up 21.83% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 10.3% for LVDS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.6% for LVDS and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LVDS charges 0.30% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $18 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LVDS currently yields 7.42% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
LVDS and QQQ share 28 holdings out of 205 unique holdings combined, representing a 26.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LVDS or QQQ?
LVDS has an expense ratio of 0.30% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LVDS or QQQ?
Over the past year LVDS returned +29.62% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so LVDS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), LVDS annualized +27.71% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LVDS or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 10.3% for LVDS. Worst drawdown: LVDS -6.6% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both LVDS and QQQ?
LVDS and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LVDS and QQQ?
LVDS and QQQ share 28 common holdings with a 26.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 205 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LVDS or QQQ?
LVDS yields 7.42% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so LVDS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.