LVDS vs VTI
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. LVDS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LVDS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $113M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.42% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 132 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +21.34% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.78% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -6.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 11, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
LVDS vs VTI Performance
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LVDS returned +28.78% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, LVDS is up 21.34% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 10.4% for LVDS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.6% for LVDS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LVDS charges 0.30% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LVDS currently yields 7.42% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
LVDS and VTI share 125 holdings out of 2793 unique holdings combined, representing a 34.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LVDS or VTI?
LVDS has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LVDS or VTI?
Over the past year LVDS returned +28.78% vs +21.39% for VTI, so LVDS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), LVDS annualized +27.32% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LVDS or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 10.4% for LVDS. Worst drawdown: LVDS -6.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both LVDS and VTI?
LVDS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LVDS and VTI?
LVDS and VTI share 125 common holdings with a 34.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2793 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LVDS or VTI?
LVDS yields 7.42% while VTI yields 1.07%, so LVDS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.