MBOX vs QQQ
Freedom Day Dividend ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. MBOX delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MBOX | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $155M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.85% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 50 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +21.82% | +16.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.73% | +26.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.36% | +25.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.76% | +14.78% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.3% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Freedom Day Dividend | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 4, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
MBOX vs QQQ Performance
Freedom Day Dividend ETF (MBOX) is a ETF from Freedom Day Dividend and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year MBOX returned +26.73% while QQQ returned +26.23%. Year to date, MBOX is up 21.82% versus a gain of 16.23% for QQQ.
Over three years, MBOX compounded at +19.36% per year against +25.75% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +12.76% and +14.78% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.02% annualized vs +12.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 14.3% for MBOX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for MBOX and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MBOX charges 0.39% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $18 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MBOX currently yields 1.85% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
MBOX and QQQ share 7 holdings out of 142 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MBOX or QQQ?
MBOX has an expense ratio of 0.39% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $21 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MBOX or QQQ?
Over the past year MBOX returned +26.73% vs +26.23% for QQQ, so MBOX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), MBOX annualized +12.66% vs +13.02% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MBOX or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 14.3% for MBOX. Worst drawdown: MBOX -16.7% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both MBOX and QQQ?
MBOX and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MBOX and QQQ?
MBOX and QQQ share 7 common holdings with a 4.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 142 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MBOX or QQQ?
MBOX yields 1.85% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so MBOX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.