MIGO vs SPY

MIGO vs SPY

Which is better, MIGO or SPY?

SPY costs less.

SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY is less concentrated, with 38.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.1%.

Lower Fees: SPYLess Concentrated: SPY

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMIGOSPY
Expense Ratio0.45%0.09%Best
AUM$772M$811.2B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.98%
Holdings501,515
YTD Return+23.30%Best+13.54%
1Y Return-+16.25%
3Y Return (annualized)-+23.72%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.95%
Top 10 Weight51.1%38.2%Best
Fund FamilyMIG Capital, LLCState Street Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionFeb 20, 2026Jan 22, 1993

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

MIGO vs SPY growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

MIGO vs SPY Performance

MIG Core ETF (MIGO) is an ETF from MIG Capital, LLC and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Year to date, MIGO is up 23.30% versus a gain of 13.54% for SPY.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

MIGO charges 0.45% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $9 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MIGO currently yields 0.00% against 0.98% for SPY.

Holdings Overlap

MIGO already in SPY38.5%
SPY already in MIGO30.7%

38.5% of MIGO's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 30.7% of SPY's money is in holdings MIGO also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

24 positions in common, counted across the 49 positions we hold weights for in MIGO and 504 in SPY, against full books of 50 and 1,515.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 473 positions for SPY that do not appear in our book for MIGO (68.5% of the fund), and 23 for MIGO that do not appear in SPY (57.9%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in MIGOWeight in SPYDifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp3.44%5.71%2.27%
NVDANvidia Corp0.65%7.78%7.13%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc2.78%3.78%1.00%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.87%2.48%1.39%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C2.69%2.49%0.20%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.80%2.22%0.58%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.2.90%1.59%1.31%
DXCMDexcom Inc.2.98%0.05%2.93%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.1.63%1.37%0.26%
LRCXLrcx Uw Equity1.50%0.52%0.98%

38.5% of MIGO is already inside SPY.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

MIGOSPY

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, MIGO or SPY?

MIGO has an expense ratio of 0.45% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between MIGO and SPY?

38.5% of MIGO's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 30.7% of SPY's is in holdings MIGO also owns. They hold 24 positions in common, counted across the 49 positions we hold weights for in MIGO and 504 in SPY.

Which pays a higher dividend, MIGO or SPY?

MIGO yields 0.00% while SPY yields 0.98%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SPY better than MIGO?

SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY is less concentrated, with 38.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.