MIGO vs VOO

MIGO vs VOO

Which is better, MIGO or VOO?

VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.4%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMIGOVOO
Expense Ratio0.45%0.03%Best
AUM$776M$997.4B
Dividend Yield-1.08%
Holdings49509
YTD Return+20.13%Best+13.37%
1Y Return-+20.08%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.29%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.89%
Top 10 Weight55.4%36.4%Best
Fund FamilyMIG Capital, LLCVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionFeb 20, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

MIGO vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

MIGO vs VOO Performance

MIG Core ETF (MIGO) is an ETF from MIG Capital, LLC and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, MIGO is up 20.13% versus a gain of 13.37% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

MIGO charges 0.45% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period.

Holdings Overlap

MIGO already in VOO39.9%
VOO already in MIGO29.8%

39.9% of MIGO's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 29.8% of VOO's money is in holdings MIGO also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

The two holdings books were reported 91 days apart, MIGO as of Mar 31, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

20 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in MIGO and 504 in VOO, against full books of 49 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 474 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for MIGO (69.6% of the fund), and 17 for MIGO that do not appear in VOO (50.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in MIGOWeight in VOODifference
NVDANvidia Corp.0.78%7.51%6.73%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 373.87%4.30%0.43%
AVGOBroadcom Inc5.01%2.77%2.24%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.49%3.62%0.13%
GOOGAlphabet, Inc., Class C3.59%2.59%1.00%
METAMeta Platform Inc 3.69%1.92%1.77%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.91%2.02%0.11%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.2.00%1.47%0.53%
WDCWestern Digital Corp Company Guar 11/28 32.51%0.34%2.17%
LRCXLam Research Corp1.82%0.84%0.98%

39.9% of MIGO is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

MIGOVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, MIGO or VOO?

MIGO has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between MIGO and VOO?

39.9% of MIGO's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 29.8% of VOO's is in holdings MIGO also owns. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in MIGO and 504 in VOO.

Is VOO better than MIGO?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.