MILN vs SPY
Global X Millennial Consumer ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MILN | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $104M | $821.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.31% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 83 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | -0.66% | +12.22% | |
| 1Y Return | -5.50% | +20.83% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.59% | +21.70% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.49% | +12.98% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -44.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 4, 2016 | Jan 22, 1993 |
MILN vs SPY Performance
Global X Millennial Consumer ETF (MILN) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year MILN returned -5.50% while SPY returned +20.83%. Year to date, MILN is down 0.66% versus a gain of 12.22% for SPY.
Over three years, MILN compounded at +14.59% per year against +21.70% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +1.49% and +12.98% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, MILN has the edge at +11.81% annualized vs +8.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MILN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.2% compared with 15.3% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.4% for MILN and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MILN charges 0.50% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $9 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MILN currently yields 0.31% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
MILN and SPY share 31 holdings out of 554 unique holdings combined, representing a 15.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MILN or SPY?
MILN has an expense ratio of 0.50% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MILN or SPY?
Over the past year MILN returned -5.50% vs +20.83% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), MILN annualized +11.81% vs +8.79% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MILN or SPY?
MILN has been the more volatile fund at 20.2% annualized versus 15.3% for SPY. Worst drawdown: MILN -44.4% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both MILN and SPY?
MILN and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MILN and SPY?
MILN and SPY share 31 common holdings with a 15.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 554 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MILN or SPY?
MILN yields 0.31% while SPY yields 1.01%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.