MILN vs VTI
Global X Millennial Consumer ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MILN | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $104M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.31% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 83 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +0.20% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | -5.07% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.19% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.54% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.2% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -44.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 4, 2016 | May 24, 2001 |
MILN vs VTI Performance
Global X Millennial Consumer ETF (MILN) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MILN returned -5.07% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, MILN is up 0.20% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, MILN compounded at +14.19% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +1.54% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, MILN has the edge at +11.92% annualized vs +8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MILN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.2% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.4% for MILN and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MILN charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MILN currently yields 0.31% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
MILN and VTI share 68 holdings out of 2800 unique holdings combined, representing a 14.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MILN or VTI?
MILN has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MILN or VTI?
Over the past year MILN returned -5.07% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), MILN annualized +11.92% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MILN or VTI?
MILN has been the more volatile fund at 20.2% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MILN -44.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MILN and VTI?
MILN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between MILN and VTI?
MILN and VTI share 68 common holdings with a 14.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2800 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MILN or VTI?
MILN yields 0.31% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.