MINN vs QQQ
Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. MINN offers more diversification with 127 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MINN | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $49M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.10% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 127 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -2.33% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.59% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.03% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.94% | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.8% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.4% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Mairs & Power | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 11, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
MINN vs QQQ Performance
Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF (MINN) is a ETF from Mairs & Power and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year MINN returned +2.59% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, MINN is down 2.33% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, MINN compounded at +3.03% per year against +25.96% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -0.94% and +14.54% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs -0.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 7.8% for MINN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for MINN and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MINN charges 0.25% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $18 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MINN currently yields 3.10% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
MINN and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 108 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MINN or QQQ?
MINN has an expense ratio of 0.25% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $7 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MINN or QQQ?
Over the past year MINN returned +2.59% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), MINN annualized -0.59% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MINN or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 7.8% for MINN. Worst drawdown: MINN -18.4% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both MINN and QQQ?
MINN and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MINN and QQQ?
MINN and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 108 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MINN or QQQ?
MINN yields 3.10% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so MINN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.