MINN vs VOO
Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, MINN or VOO?
VOO has been ahead.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MINN | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $51M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.14% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 127 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -6.46% | +12.37%Best |
| 1Y Return | -4.34% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +1.65% | +21.37%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.76% | +13.49%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.8%Best | 15.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.4%Best | -24.5% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,150 | $18,827Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.1% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Mairs & Power | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 11, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 12, 2021 to Sep 18, 2026 (5.5 years).
MINN vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.5 years both funds cover.
MINN vs VOO Performance
Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF (MINN) is an ETF from Mairs & Power and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MINN returned -4.34% while VOO returned +16.61%. Year to date, MINN is down 6.46% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.
Over three years, MINN compounded at +1.65% per year against +21.37% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -1.76% and +13.49% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +14.32% annualized vs -1.35%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 7.8% for MINN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for MINN and -24.5% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MINN charges 0.25% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MINN currently yields 3.14% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
48.8% of MINN's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 29.8% of VOO's money is in holdings MINN also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
21 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in MINN and 494 in VOO, against full books of 127 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 466 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for MINN (69.3% of the fund), and 7 for MINN that do not appear in VOO (16.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MINN | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.31% | 7.55% | 0.24% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.93% | 5.36% | 0.57% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.37% | 4.13% | 1.24% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.40% | 2.86% | 0.54% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 2.32% | 3.24% | 0.92% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.75% | 1.90% | 0.85% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.31% | 1.21% | 1.10% |
| GEVGe Vernova, Inc. | 2.15% | 0.41% | 1.74% |
| LITELumentum Holdings Inc | 2.43% | 0.09% | 2.34% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp Company Guar 11/28 3 | 2.18% | 0.29% | 1.89% |
48.8% of MINN is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MINN or VOO?
MINN has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MINN or VOO?
Over the past year MINN returned -4.34% vs +16.61% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), MINN annualized -1.35% vs +14.32% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MINN or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 7.8% for MINN. Worst drawdown: MINN -18.4% vs VOO -24.5%.
Should I hold both MINN and VOO?
MINN and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MINN and VOO?
48.8% of MINN's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 29.8% of VOO's is in holdings MINN also owns. They hold 21 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in MINN and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, MINN or VOO?
MINN yields 3.14% while VOO yields 1.04%, so MINN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than MINN?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.