MINN vs VOO
Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MINN | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $48M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.05% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 117 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -2.18% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.32% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.72% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.91% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Mairs & Power | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 11, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
MINN vs VOO Performance
Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF (MINN) is a ETF from Mairs & Power and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MINN returned +2.32% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, MINN is down 2.18% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Over three years, MINN compounded at +2.72% per year against +21.55% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -0.91% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.56% annualized vs -0.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 7.8% for MINN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for MINN and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MINN charges 0.25% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MINN currently yields 3.05% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
MINN and VOO share 0 holdings out of 511 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MINN or VOO?
MINN has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MINN or VOO?
Over the past year MINN returned +2.32% vs +21.63% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), MINN annualized -0.56% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MINN or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 7.8% for MINN. Worst drawdown: MINN -18.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MINN and VOO?
MINN and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MINN and VOO?
MINN and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 511 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MINN or VOO?
MINN yields 3.05% while VOO yields 1.09%, so MINN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.