NECK vs QQQ
xETFs AI Bottlenecks ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, NECK or QQQ?
QQQ costs less.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 67.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NECK | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $14M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 20 | 321 |
| YTD Return | -13.22% | +17.07%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +13.04% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +27.74% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.81% |
| Top 10 Weight | 67.2% | 46.7%Best |
| Fund Family | WallStreetX ETFs, Inc. | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 22, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
NECK vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
NECK vs QQQ Performance
xETFs AI Bottlenecks ETF (NECK) is an ETF from WallStreetX ETFs, Inc. and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, NECK is down 13.22% versus a gain of 17.07% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NECK charges 0.75% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $18 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NECK currently yields 0.00% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
27.1% of NECK's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 9.1% of QQQ's money is in holdings NECK also owns.
NECK and QQQ share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 20 positions we hold weights for in NECK and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 20 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 89 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for NECK (88.1% of the fund), and 10 for NECK that do not appear in QQQ (46.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
27.1% of NECK is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NECK or QQQ?
NECK has an expense ratio of 0.75% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between NECK and QQQ?
27.1% of NECK's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 9.1% of QQQ's is in holdings NECK also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 20 positions we hold weights for in NECK and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, NECK or QQQ?
NECK yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than NECK?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 67.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.