NECK vs VOO

NECK vs VOO

Which is better, NECK or VOO?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 39.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 67.1%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNECKVOO
Expense Ratio0.75%0.03%Best
AUM$10M$1.0T
Dividend Yield0.00%1.05%
Holdings42519
YTD Return-23.37%+12.11%Best
1Y Return-+12.50%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.54%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.93%
Top 10 Weight67.1%39.1%Best
Fund FamilyWallStreetX ETFs, Inc.Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionSep 22, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

NECK vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

NECK vs VOO Performance

xETFs AI Bottlenecks ETF (NECK) is an ETF from WallStreetX ETFs, Inc. and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, NECK is down 23.37% versus a gain of 12.11% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NECK charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NECK currently yields 0.00% against 1.05% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

NECK already in VOO56.2%
VOO already in NECK6.2%

56.2% of NECK's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 6.2% of VOO's money is in holdings NECK also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

10 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in NECK and 506 in VOO, against full books of 42 and 519.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 491 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for NECK (93.8% of the fund), and 6 for NECK that do not appear in VOO (17.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in NECKWeight in VOODifference
MUMicron Technology, Inc.7.11%1.83%5.28%
LITELumentum Holdings Inc8.61%0.13%8.48%
COHRCoherent Corp7.59%0.09%7.50%
AVGOBroadcom Inc4.43%2.54%1.89%
GEVGe Vernova5.17%0.38%4.79%
MRVLMarvell Technology Inc4.94%0.35%4.59%
ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock4.92%0.32%4.60%
ETNEaton Corporation Plc Ordinary Shares4.86%0.25%4.61%
VRTVertiv Holdings Co4.59%0.14%4.45%
BEBLOOM ENERGY CORP3.94%0.12%3.82%

56.2% of NECK is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

NECKVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NECK or VOO?

NECK has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between NECK and VOO?

56.2% of NECK's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 6.2% of VOO's is in holdings NECK also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in NECK and 506 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, NECK or VOO?

NECK yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.05%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than NECK?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 39.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 67.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.