NGIF vs QQQ

NGIF vs QQQ

Which is better, NGIF or QQQ?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. NGIF led over 1Y. NGIF is less concentrated, with 44.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.9%.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns (1Y): NGIFLess Concentrated: NGIF

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNGIFQQQ
Expense Ratio0.88%0.18%Best
AUM$566M$437.3B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.43%
Holdings109208
YTD Return+1.99%+10.43%Best
1Y Return-+8.78%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.14%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.29%
Top 10 Weight44.1%Best46.9%
Fund FamilyNuveenInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJun 2, 2026Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

NGIF vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

NGIF vs QQQ Performance

Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund ETF (NGIF) is an ETF from Nuveen and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, NGIF is up 1.99% versus a gain of 10.43% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NGIF charges 0.88% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $88 vs $18 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NGIF currently yields 0.00% against 0.43% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

NGIF already in QQQ38.8%
QQQ already in NGIF26.6%

38.8% of NGIF's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 26.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings NGIF also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

13 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in NGIF and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 109 and 208.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 81 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for NGIF (70.6% of the fund), and 25 for NGIF that do not appear in QQQ (52.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in NGIFWeight in QQQDifference
AAPLApple Inc6.89%7.68%0.79%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp7.97%6.16%1.81%
AVGOBroadcom Inc4.99%2.52%2.47%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C4.28%2.93%1.35%
WMTWalmart Inc1.92%2.43%0.51%
LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares2.45%0.97%1.48%
ADIAnalog Devices2.01%0.83%1.18%
TMUST-Mobile Usa Inc Esrw Usd Npv Ref Sm#5855581.78%0.72%1.06%
BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc.1.79%0.53%1.26%
SBUXStarbucks Corp1.68%0.47%1.21%

38.8% of NGIF is already inside QQQ.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

NGIFQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NGIF or QQQ?

NGIF has an expense ratio of 0.88% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $70 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between NGIF and QQQ?

38.8% of NGIF's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 26.6% of QQQ's is in holdings NGIF also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in NGIF and 101 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, NGIF or QQQ?

NGIF yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.43%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than NGIF?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. NGIF led over 1Y. NGIF is less concentrated, with 44.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.