NZAC vs VOO
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. NZAC offers more diversification with 715 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NZAC | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.12% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $199M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.07% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 715 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +10.91% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.77% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.32% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.79% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.8% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 25, 2014 | Sep 7, 2010 |
NZAC vs VOO Performance
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NZAC returned +18.77% while VOO returned +21.79%. Year to date, NZAC is up 10.91% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Over three years, NZAC compounded at +19.32% per year against +22.19% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.79% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.59% annualized vs +9.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NZAC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.8% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.7% for NZAC and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NZAC charges 0.12% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $12 vs $3 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NZAC currently yields 2.07% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
NZAC and VOO share 221 holdings out of 909 unique holdings combined, representing a 53.1% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NZAC or VOO?
NZAC has an expense ratio of 0.12% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $9 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NZAC or VOO?
Over the past year NZAC returned +18.77% vs +21.79% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), NZAC annualized +9.10% vs +13.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NZAC or VOO?
NZAC has been the more volatile fund at 14.8% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: NZAC -33.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both NZAC and VOO?
NZAC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between NZAC and VOO?
NZAC and VOO share 221 common holdings with a 53.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 909 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NZAC or VOO?
NZAC yields 2.07% while VOO yields 1.08%, so NZAC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.