OAKL vs VTI
Oakmark US Concentrated ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, OAKL or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 34.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OAKL | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $334M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 27 | 3,542 |
| YTD Return | +6.77% | +8.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +11.14% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.84% |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.0% | 34.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Oakmark Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 5, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
OAKL vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
OAKL vs VTI Performance
Oakmark US Concentrated ETF (OAKL) is an ETF from Oakmark Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, OAKL is up 6.77% versus a gain of 8.54% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OAKL charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OAKL currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
90.4% of OAKL's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 8.8% of VTI's money is in holdings OAKL also owns.
Most of OAKL is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
25 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in OAKL and 3,464 in VTI, against full books of 27 and 3,542.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 27 and 3,464 positions we hold weights for.
VTI holds 1,104 positions OAKL does not, 88.2% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 7.13%, AAPL 6.63%, MSFT 5.19%, AMZN 3.30%, AVGO 2.28%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in OAKL | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRMSalesforce Inc Crm Us Equity | 7.85% | 0.24% | 7.61% |
| IQVIqvia Holdings Inc. | 6.53% | 0.06% | 6.47% |
| FCNCAFirst Citizens BancShares Inc | 6.31% | 0.02% | 6.29% |
| PAYCPaycom Software Inc . | 5.75% | 0.01% | 5.74% |
| KDPKeurig Dr Pepper Inc (kdp Us) | 5.66% | 0.05% | 5.61% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.03% | 2.18% | 0.85% |
| ABNBAirbnb Inc | 4.98% | 0.09% | 4.89% |
| ICEInterContinental Hotels Group PLC Ord Gbp0.208521303 | 4.65% | 0.12% | 4.53% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.58% | 2.18% | 0.40% |
| CRLCharles River Laboratories International Inc | 4.72% | 0.02% | 4.70% |
90.4% of OAKL is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OAKL or VTI?
OAKL has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between OAKL and VTI?
90.4% of OAKL's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 8.8% of VTI's is in holdings OAKL also owns. They hold 25 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in OAKL and 3,464 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, OAKL or VTI?
OAKL yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than OAKL?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 34.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.