PEXL vs VOO

PEXL vs VOO

Which is better, PEXL or VOO?

Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. PEXL led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.9%.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPEXLVOO
Expense Ratio0.49%0.03%Best
AUM$54M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.31%1.04%
Holdings102509
YTD Return+17.05%Best+12.50%
1Y Return+26.95%Best+17.58%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.42%+21.27%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+11.06%+12.95%Best
Volatility (annualized)21.9%16.7%Best
Max Drawdown-36.9%-34.3%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$16,896$18,384Best
Top 10 Weight43.9%36.4%Best
Fund FamilyPacer ETFsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJul 23, 2018Sep 7, 2010

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 24, 2018 to Sep 11, 2026 (8.1 years).

PEXL vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.1 years both funds cover.

PEXL vs VOO Performance

Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PEXL returned +26.95% while VOO returned +17.58%. Year to date, PEXL is up 17.05% versus a gain of 12.50% for VOO.

Over three years, PEXL compounded at +19.42% per year against +21.27% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +11.06% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +14.16% annualized vs +14.06%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

PEXL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 16.7% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.9% for PEXL and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PEXL charges 0.49% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PEXL currently yields 0.31% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

PEXL already in VOO97.1%
VOO already in PEXL33.9%

97.1% of PEXL's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 33.9% of VOO's money is in holdings PEXL also owns.

Most of PEXL is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

The two holdings books were reported 63 days apart, PEXL as of Sep 1, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

71 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in PEXL and 505 in VOO, against full books of 102 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 425 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for PEXL (65.5% of the fund), and 30 for PEXL that do not appear in VOO (2.9%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in PEXLWeight in VOODifference
AAPLApple, Inc5.58%6.59%1.01%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 376.66%4.30%2.36%
GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.0014.84%3.25%1.59%
AVGOBroadcom Inc4.97%2.77%2.20%
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.5.18%1.92%3.26%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc.4.72%1.47%3.25%
LRCXLam Research Corp3.06%0.84%2.22%
AMATApplied Materials, Inc.2.95%0.89%2.06%
KOCoca Cola Co.3.09%0.49%2.60%
GEGeneral Electric Co.2.84%0.60%2.24%

97.1% of PEXL is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

PEXLVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PEXL or VOO?

PEXL has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, PEXL or VOO?

Over the past year PEXL returned +26.95% vs +17.58% for VOO, so PEXL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), PEXL annualized +14.06% vs +14.16% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, PEXL or VOO?

PEXL has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 16.7% for VOO. Worst drawdown: PEXL -36.9% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both PEXL and VOO?

PEXL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between PEXL and VOO?

97.1% of PEXL's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 33.9% of VOO's is in holdings PEXL also owns. They hold 71 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in PEXL and 505 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, PEXL or VOO?

PEXL yields 0.31% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than PEXL?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. PEXL led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.