PJBF vs VTI
PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PJBF | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $11M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.21% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 44 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +7.20% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.43% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -25.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 14, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
PJBF vs VTI Performance
PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) is a ETF from PGIM Investments and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PJBF returned +11.43% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, PJBF is up 7.20% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PJBF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.2% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.7% for PJBF and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PJBF charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PJBF currently yields 0.21% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
PJBF and VTI share 21 holdings out of 2799 unique holdings combined, representing a 24.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PJBF or VTI?
PJBF has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PJBF or VTI?
Over the past year PJBF returned +11.43% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), PJBF annualized +11.98% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PJBF or VTI?
PJBF has been the more volatile fund at 18.2% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PJBF -25.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PJBF and VTI?
PJBF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PJBF and VTI?
PJBF and VTI share 21 common holdings with a 24.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2799 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PJBF or VTI?
PJBF yields 0.21% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.