PSIL vs VYM
ADVISORSHARES PSYCHEDELICS ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. PSIL delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSIL | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $49M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.19% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 31 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +47.73% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +69.41% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.31% | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -22.13% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 49.8% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -92.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 15, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
PSIL vs VYM Performance
ADVISORSHARES PSYCHEDELICS ETF (PSIL) is a ETF from Advisor Shares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSIL returned +69.41% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, PSIL is up 47.73% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Over three years, PSIL compounded at +15.31% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -22.13% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs -22.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSIL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 49.8% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -92.7% for PSIL and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.23. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSIL charges 1.00% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $4 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSIL currently yields 7.19% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSIL or VYM?
PSIL has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $96 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PSIL or VYM?
Over the past year PSIL returned +69.41% vs +26.12% for VYM, so PSIL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), PSIL annualized -22.13% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PSIL or VYM?
PSIL has been the more volatile fund at 49.8% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: PSIL -92.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both PSIL and VYM?
PSIL and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.23, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PSIL and VYM?
PSIL and VYM share 2 common holdings with a 4.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 585 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSIL or VYM?
PSIL yields 7.19% while VYM yields 2.86%, so PSIL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.