PSIL vs QQQ
ADVISORSHARES PSYCHEDELICS ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. PSIL delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSIL | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $49M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.19% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 31 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +47.85% | +18.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +72.26% | +25.37% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.39% | +25.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -22.06% | +15.20% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 49.8% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -92.7% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 15, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
PSIL vs QQQ Performance
ADVISORSHARES PSYCHEDELICS ETF (PSIL) is a ETF from Advisor Shares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year PSIL returned +72.26% while QQQ returned +25.37%. Year to date, PSIL is up 47.85% versus a gain of 18.31% for QQQ.
Over three years, PSIL compounded at +17.39% per year against +25.79% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -22.06% and +15.20% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.10% annualized vs -22.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSIL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 49.8% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -92.7% for PSIL and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSIL charges 1.00% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $18 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSIL currently yields 7.19% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
PSIL and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 132 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSIL or QQQ?
PSIL has an expense ratio of 1.00% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PSIL or QQQ?
Over the past year PSIL returned +72.26% vs +25.37% for QQQ, so PSIL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), PSIL annualized -22.06% vs +13.10% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PSIL or QQQ?
PSIL has been the more volatile fund at 49.8% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: PSIL -92.7% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both PSIL and QQQ?
PSIL and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PSIL and QQQ?
PSIL and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 132 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSIL or QQQ?
PSIL yields 7.19% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so PSIL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.