PSIL vs VOO
ADVISORSHARES PSYCHEDELICS ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. PSIL delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSIL | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $49M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.19% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 31 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +43.66% | +13.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +69.02% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.91% | +21.78% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -22.54% | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 49.7% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -92.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 15, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
PSIL vs VOO Performance
ADVISORSHARES PSYCHEDELICS ETF (PSIL) is a ETF from Advisor Shares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSIL returned +69.02% while VOO returned +23.01%. Year to date, PSIL is up 43.66% versus a gain of 13.79% for VOO.
Over three years, PSIL compounded at +15.91% per year against +21.78% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -22.54% and +13.39% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.57% annualized vs -22.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSIL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 49.7% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -92.7% for PSIL and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.31. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSIL charges 1.00% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSIL currently yields 7.19% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
PSIL and VOO share 3 holdings out of 531 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSIL or VOO?
PSIL has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PSIL or VOO?
Over the past year PSIL returned +69.02% vs +23.01% for VOO, so PSIL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), PSIL annualized -22.54% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PSIL or VOO?
PSIL has been the more volatile fund at 49.7% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: PSIL -92.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both PSIL and VOO?
PSIL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.31, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PSIL and VOO?
PSIL and VOO share 3 common holdings with a 3.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 531 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSIL or VOO?
PSIL yields 7.19% while VOO yields 1.09%, so PSIL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.