PSIL vs VTI
ADVISORSHARES PSYCHEDELICS ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PSIL delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSIL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $49M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.19% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 31 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +44.83% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +70.39% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.60% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -22.40% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 49.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -92.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 15, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
PSIL vs VTI Performance
ADVISORSHARES PSYCHEDELICS ETF (PSIL) is a ETF from Advisor Shares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSIL returned +70.39% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, PSIL is up 44.83% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Over three years, PSIL compounded at +16.60% per year against +21.17% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -22.40% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.13% annualized vs -22.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSIL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 49.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -92.7% for PSIL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSIL charges 1.00% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSIL currently yields 7.19% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
PSIL and VTI share 10 holdings out of 2802 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSIL or VTI?
PSIL has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PSIL or VTI?
Over the past year PSIL returned +70.39% vs +23.31% for VTI, so PSIL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), PSIL annualized -22.40% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PSIL or VTI?
PSIL has been the more volatile fund at 49.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PSIL -92.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PSIL and VTI?
PSIL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PSIL and VTI?
PSIL and VTI share 10 common holdings with a 2.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2802 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSIL or VTI?
PSIL yields 7.19% while VTI yields 1.07%, so PSIL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.