PTNQ vs VYM
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PTNQ | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $1.3B | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.84% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 104 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +9.14% | +14.66% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.30% | +22.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.15% | +18.72% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.72% | +12.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -28.1% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 11, 2015 | Nov 10, 2006 |
PTNQ vs VYM Performance
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PTNQ returned +18.30% while VYM returned +22.16%. Year to date, PTNQ is up 9.14% versus a gain of 14.66% for VYM.
Over three years, PTNQ compounded at +13.15% per year against +18.72% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +9.72% and +12.18% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, PTNQ has the edge at +12.40% annualized vs +7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 14.4% for PTNQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.1% for PTNQ and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PTNQ charges 0.65% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $4 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PTNQ currently yields 0.84% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
PTNQ and VYM share 28 holdings out of 677 unique holdings combined, representing a 15.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PTNQ or VYM?
PTNQ has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $61 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PTNQ or VYM?
Over the past year PTNQ returned +18.30% vs +22.16% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), PTNQ annualized +12.40% vs +7.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PTNQ or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 14.4% for PTNQ. Worst drawdown: PTNQ -28.1% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both PTNQ and VYM?
PTNQ and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PTNQ and VYM?
PTNQ and VYM share 28 common holdings with a 15.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 677 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PTNQ or VYM?
PTNQ yields 0.84% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.