IVV vs PTNQ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PTNQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.65% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $1.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.84% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +9.55% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +19.34% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | +13.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | +9.64% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -28.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Pacer ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 11, 2015 |
IVV vs PTNQ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while PTNQ returned +19.34%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 9.55% for PTNQ.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against +13.27% for PTNQ; over five years the annualized figures are +12.96% and +9.64% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, PTNQ has the edge at +12.43% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.4% for PTNQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -28.1% for PTNQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PTNQ charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $65 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.84% for PTNQ.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and PTNQ share 86 holdings out of 521 unique holdings combined, representing a 53.3% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PTNQ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PTNQ charges 0.65%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or PTNQ?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +19.34% for PTNQ, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +12.43% for PTNQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or PTNQ?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.4% for PTNQ. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs PTNQ -28.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and PTNQ?
IVV and PTNQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PTNQ?
IVV and PTNQ share 86 common holdings with a 53.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 521 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PTNQ?
IVV yields 1.10% while PTNQ yields 0.84%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.