PWRD vs VOO
TCW Transform Systems ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, PWRD or VOO?
Each has led over a different period.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. PWRD led over 3Y and the full window, VOO over 1Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PWRD | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.4B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.06% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 34 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +7.35% | +13.31%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.38% | +17.07%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.85%Best | +22.72% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.19% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.3% | 15.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.9% | -22.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.6 years | $22,028Best | $18,286 |
| Top 10 Weight | 52.6% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | TCW ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 2, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 3, 2022 to Sep 23, 2026 (4.6 years).
PWRD vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.6 years both funds cover.
PWRD vs VOO Performance
TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) is an ETF from TCW ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PWRD returned +9.38% while VOO returned +17.07%. Year to date, PWRD is up 7.35% versus a gain of 13.31% for VOO.
Over three years, PWRD compounded at +27.85% per year against +22.72% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PWRD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.3% compared with 15.6% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.9% for PWRD and -22.1% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PWRD charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PWRD currently yields 0.06% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
61.8% of PWRD's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 7.9% of VOO's money is in holdings PWRD also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
16 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in PWRD and 494 in VOO, against full books of 34 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 471 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for PWRD (91.3% of the fund), and 6 for PWRD that do not appear in VOO (19.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PWRD | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 8.60% | 0.58% | 8.02% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.95% | 2.86% | 1.09% |
| VRTVertiv Holdings Co | 5.61% | 0.14% | 5.47% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock | 5.38% | 0.29% | 5.09% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 4.75% | 0.63% | 4.12% |
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 4.57% | 0.27% | 4.30% |
| KLACKla Corp | 4.14% | 0.37% | 3.77% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 3.33% | 1.00% | 2.33% |
| GEVGe Vernova, Inc. | 3.41% | 0.41% | 3.00% |
| TTTrane Technologies PLC|125 | 3.48% | 0.16% | 3.32% |
61.8% of PWRD is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PWRD or VOO?
PWRD has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PWRD or VOO?
Over the past year PWRD returned +9.38% vs +17.07% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PWRD or VOO?
PWRD has been the more volatile fund at 23.3% annualized versus 15.6% for VOO. Worst drawdown: PWRD -25.9% vs VOO -22.1%.
Should I hold both PWRD and VOO?
PWRD and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PWRD and VOO?
61.8% of PWRD's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 7.9% of VOO's is in holdings PWRD also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in PWRD and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, PWRD or VOO?
PWRD yields 0.06% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than PWRD?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. PWRD led over 3Y and the full window, VOO over 1Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.