PZLV vs SPY

PZLV vs SPY

Which is better, PZLV or SPY?

Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.1%.

Lower Fees: SPYLess Concentrated: SPY

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPZLVSPY
Expense Ratio0.60%0.09%Best
AUM$71M$804.7B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.98%
Holdings41505
YTD Return+24.59%Best+11.45%
1Y Return-+15.87%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.93%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.59%
Top 10 Weight39.1%37.8%Best
Fund FamilyPzena FundsState Street Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionApr 1, 2026Jan 22, 1993

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

PZLV vs SPY growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

PZLV vs SPY Performance

Pzena US Large Cap Value ETF (PZLV) is an ETF from Pzena Funds and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Year to date, PZLV is up 24.59% versus a gain of 11.45% for SPY.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PZLV charges 0.60% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $9 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PZLV currently yields 0.00% against 0.98% for SPY.

Holdings Overlap

PZLV already in SPY63.1%
SPY already in PZLV2.8%

63.1% of PZLV's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 2.8% of SPY's money is in holdings PZLV also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

23 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in PZLV and 504 in SPY, against full books of 41 and 505.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 474 positions for SPY that do not appear in our book for PZLV (96.5% of the fund), and 15 for PZLV that do not appear in SPY (32.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in PZLVWeight in SPYDifference
HUMHumana Inc.5.67%0.07%5.60%
BAXBaxter International Inc.5.04%0.02%5.02%
DGDollar General Corp.3.74%0.04%3.70%
CVSCvs Corp3.51%0.19%3.32%
WFCWells Fargo & Co.3.08%0.40%2.68%
COFCapital One Financial Corp.3.23%0.20%3.03%
METMetlife Inc.3.24%0.08%3.16%
SWKSSkyworks Solutions Inc.3.17%0.02%3.15%
CTSHCognizant Technology Solutions Corp. Class A3.13%0.05%3.08%
CDWCDW Corporation3.12%0.03%3.09%

63.1% of PZLV is already inside SPY.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

PZLVSPY

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PZLV or SPY?

PZLV has an expense ratio of 0.60% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $51 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between PZLV and SPY?

63.1% of PZLV's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 2.8% of SPY's is in holdings PZLV also owns. They hold 23 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in PZLV and 504 in SPY.

Which pays a higher dividend, PZLV or SPY?

PZLV yields 0.00% while SPY yields 0.98%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SPY better than PZLV?

SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.