PZLV vs VOO

PZLV vs VOO

Which is better, PZLV or VOO?

Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.1%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPZLVVOO
Expense Ratio0.60%0.03%Best
AUM$71M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.04%
Holdings41509
YTD Return+21.81%Best+12.37%
1Y Return-+16.61%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.37%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.49%
Top 10 Weight39.1%37.6%Best
Fund FamilyPzena FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionApr 1, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

PZLV vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

PZLV vs VOO Performance

Pzena US Large Cap Value ETF (PZLV) is an ETF from Pzena Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, PZLV is up 21.81% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PZLV charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PZLV currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

PZLV already in VOO65.1%
VOO already in PZLV3.0%

65.1% of PZLV's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 3.0% of VOO's money is in holdings PZLV also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

24 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in PZLV and 494 in VOO, against full books of 41 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 463 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for PZLV (96.2% of the fund), and 14 for PZLV that do not appear in VOO (30.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in PZLVWeight in VOODifference
HUMHumana Inc.5.67%0.07%5.60%
BAXBaxter International Inc.5.04%0.02%5.02%
DGDollar General Corp.3.74%0.04%3.70%
CVSCvs Corp3.51%0.21%3.30%
WFCWells Fargo & Co.3.08%0.41%2.67%
COFCapital One Financial Corp.3.23%0.20%3.03%
METMetlife Inc.3.24%0.08%3.16%
SWKSSkyworks Solutions Inc.3.17%0.01%3.16%
CTSHCognizant Technology Solutions Corp. Class A3.13%0.04%3.09%
CDWCDW Corporation3.12%0.03%3.09%

65.1% of PZLV is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

PZLVVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PZLV or VOO?

PZLV has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between PZLV and VOO?

65.1% of PZLV's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 3.0% of VOO's is in holdings PZLV also owns. They hold 24 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in PZLV and 494 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, PZLV or VOO?

PZLV yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than PZLV?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.