PZLV vs VYM

PZLV vs VYM

Which is better, PZLV or VYM?

VYM costs less.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.1%.

Lower Fees: VYMLess Concentrated: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPZLVVYM
Expense Ratio0.60%0.04%Best
AUM$71M$81.6B
Dividend Yield0.00%2.22%
Holdings41613
YTD Return+24.59%Best+12.87%
1Y Return-+17.25%
3Y Return (annualized)-+17.66%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.98%
Top 10 Weight39.1%26.1%Best
Fund FamilyPzena FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Value
InceptionApr 1, 2026Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

PZLV vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

PZLV vs VYM Performance

Pzena US Large Cap Value ETF (PZLV) is an ETF from Pzena Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, PZLV is up 24.59% versus a gain of 12.87% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PZLV charges 0.60% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $4 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PZLV currently yields 0.00% against 2.22% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

PZLV already in VYM75.9%
VYM already in PZLV7.2%

75.9% of PZLV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 7.2% of VYM's money is in holdings PZLV also owns.

Most of PZLV is already inside VYM. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

27 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in PZLV and 557 in VYM, against full books of 41 and 613.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 501 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for PZLV (89.9% of the fund), and 11 for PZLV that do not appear in VYM (20.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in PZLVWeight in VYMDifference
HUMHumana Inc.5.67%0.18%5.49%
BAXBaxter International Inc.5.04%0.05%4.99%
CRBGCorebridge Financial Inc4.51%0.03%4.48%
WFCWells Fargo & Co.3.08%1.07%2.01%
CVSCvs Corp3.51%0.54%2.97%
DGDollar General Corp.3.74%0.11%3.63%
COFCapital One Financial Corp.3.23%0.53%2.70%
LEALear Corp.3.70%0.03%3.67%
BACBank Of America Corp.1.86%1.66%0.20%
METMetlife Inc.3.24%0.21%3.03%

75.9% of PZLV is already inside VYM.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

PZLVVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PZLV or VYM?

PZLV has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between PZLV and VYM?

75.9% of PZLV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 7.2% of VYM's is in holdings PZLV also owns. They hold 27 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in PZLV and 557 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, PZLV or VYM?

PZLV yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than PZLV?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.