QCLR vs VOO
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QCLR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 15.35% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -1.57% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.74% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.53% | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.03% | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 25, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
QCLR vs VOO Performance
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QCLR returned +2.74% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, QCLR is down 1.57% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Over three years, QCLR compounded at +16.53% per year against +22.06% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.03% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs +9.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 13.1% for QCLR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.8% for QCLR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QCLR charges 0.25% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QCLR currently yields 15.35% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
QCLR and VOO share 75 holdings out of 517 unique holdings combined, representing a 18.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QCLR or VOO?
QCLR has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QCLR or VOO?
Over the past year QCLR returned +2.74% vs +21.87% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QCLR annualized +9.03% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QCLR or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 13.1% for QCLR. Worst drawdown: QCLR -21.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QCLR and VOO?
QCLR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QCLR and VOO?
QCLR and VOO share 75 common holdings with a 18.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 517 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QCLR or VOO?
QCLR yields 15.35% while VOO yields 1.08%, so QCLR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.