QCLR vs VTI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QCLR | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 15.35% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -1.57% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.74% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.53% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.03% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 25, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
QCLR vs VTI Performance
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QCLR returned +2.74% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, QCLR is down 1.57% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, QCLR compounded at +16.53% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +9.03% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QCLR has the edge at +9.03% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.1% for QCLR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.8% for QCLR and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QCLR charges 0.25% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QCLR currently yields 15.35% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
QCLR and VTI share 75 holdings out of 2799 unique holdings combined, representing a 16.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QCLR or VTI?
QCLR has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QCLR or VTI?
Over the past year QCLR returned +2.74% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QCLR annualized +9.03% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QCLR or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.1% for QCLR. Worst drawdown: QCLR -21.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both QCLR and VTI?
QCLR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QCLR and VTI?
QCLR and VTI share 75 common holdings with a 16.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2799 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QCLR or VTI?
QCLR yields 15.35% while VTI yields 1.07%, so QCLR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.