QCLR vs QQQ
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QCLR | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $3M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 15.35% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -2.26% | +15.47% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.04% | +24.44% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.21% | +25.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.86% | +14.22% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.1% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.8% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 25, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
QCLR vs QQQ Performance
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year QCLR returned +1.04% while QQQ returned +24.44%. Year to date, QCLR is down 2.26% versus a gain of 15.47% for QQQ.
Over three years, QCLR compounded at +16.21% per year against +25.47% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +8.86% and +14.22% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +12.99% annualized vs +8.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 13.1% for QCLR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.8% for QCLR and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QCLR charges 0.25% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $18 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QCLR currently yields 15.35% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
QCLR and QQQ share 84 holdings out of 105 unique holdings combined, representing a 41.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QCLR or QQQ?
QCLR has an expense ratio of 0.25% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $7 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QCLR or QQQ?
Over the past year QCLR returned +1.04% vs +24.44% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QCLR annualized +8.86% vs +12.99% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QCLR or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 13.1% for QCLR. Worst drawdown: QCLR -21.8% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both QCLR and QQQ?
QCLR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QCLR and QQQ?
QCLR and QQQ share 84 common holdings with a 41.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 105 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QCLR or QQQ?
QCLR yields 15.35% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QCLR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.