QDTY vs XQQI
YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF vs NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
Which is better, QDTY or XQQI?
XQQI costs less.
XQQI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QDTY | XQQI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.17% | 0.98%Best |
| AUM | $28M | $381M |
| Dividend Yield | 36.64% | 11.96% |
| Holdings | 10 | 213 |
| YTD Return | +16.70% | +18.23%Best |
| 1Y Return | +20.73% | - |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | NEOS |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Feb 12, 2025 | Feb 2, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
QDTY vs XQQI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QDTY vs XQQI Performance
YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF and NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI) is an ETF from NEOS. Year to date, QDTY is up 16.70% versus a gain of 18.23% for XQQI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QDTY charges 1.17% per year while XQQI charges 0.98%. On a $10,000 position that is $117 vs $98 annually, a gap of $19 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QDTY currently yields 36.64% against 11.96% for XQQI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in QDTY and 101 in XQQI, totalling 0.5% and 101.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in QDTY and 101 in XQQI, against full books of 10 and 213.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QDTY and XQQI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QDTY or XQQI?
QDTY has an expense ratio of 1.17% while XQQI charges 0.98%. XQQI is the cheaper option, by $19 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, QDTY or XQQI?
QDTY yields 36.64% while XQQI yields 11.96%, so QDTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XQQI better than QDTY?
XQQI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.