QINT vs VOO
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, QINT or VOO?
Each has led over a different period.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. QINT led over 1Y and 3Y, VOO over 5Y and the full window. QINT is less concentrated, with 11.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QINT | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.34% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $745M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.44% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 381 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +13.08%Best | +12.74% |
| 1Y Return | +21.83%Best | +19.43% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.69%Best | +21.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.58% | +12.76%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6%Best | 16.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -34.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,800 | $18,230Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 11.9%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | American Century Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 10, 2018 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 12, 2018 to Sep 8, 2026 (8 years).
QINT vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8 years both funds cover.
QINT vs VOO Performance
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) is an ETF from American Century Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QINT returned +21.83% while VOO returned +19.43%. Year to date, QINT is up 13.08% versus a gain of 12.74% for VOO.
Over three years, QINT compounded at +21.69% per year against +21.18% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.58% and +12.76% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +14.08% annualized vs +9.90%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 16.6% for QINT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for QINT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QINT charges 0.34% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $34 vs $3 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QINT currently yields 2.44% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
0.3% of QINT's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.2% of VOO's money is in holdings QINT also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
The two holdings books were reported 48 days apart, QINT as of Aug 17, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
2 positions in common, counted across the 346 positions we hold weights for in QINT and 504 in VOO, against full books of 381 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 493 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for QINT (99.2% of the fund), and 5 for QINT that do not appear in VOO (1.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QINT and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QINT or VOO?
QINT has an expense ratio of 0.34% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QINT or VOO?
Over the past year QINT returned +21.83% vs +19.43% for VOO, so QINT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), QINT annualized +9.90% vs +14.08% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QINT or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 16.6% for QINT. Worst drawdown: QINT -33.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QINT and VOO?
QINT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QINT or VOO?
QINT yields 2.44% while VOO yields 1.08%, so QINT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than QINT?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. QINT led over 1Y and 3Y, VOO over 5Y and the full window. QINT is less concentrated, with 11.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.