QINT vs VOO
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. QINT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QINT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.34% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $654M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.48% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 366 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +14.35% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.36% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.09% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | American Century Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 10, 2018 | Sep 7, 2010 |
QINT vs VOO Performance
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) is a ETF from American Century Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QINT returned +25.36% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, QINT is up 14.35% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Over three years, QINT compounded at +21.81% per year against +21.55% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +10.09% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.56% annualized vs +10.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QINT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for QINT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QINT charges 0.34% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $34 vs $3 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QINT currently yields 2.48% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
QINT and VOO share 2 holdings out of 840 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QINT or VOO?
QINT has an expense ratio of 0.34% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QINT or VOO?
Over the past year QINT returned +25.36% vs +21.63% for VOO, so QINT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), QINT annualized +10.16% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QINT or VOO?
QINT has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QINT -33.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QINT and VOO?
QINT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QINT and VOO?
QINT and VOO share 2 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 840 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QINT or VOO?
QINT yields 2.48% while VOO yields 1.09%, so QINT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.