QNXT vs VTI
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, QNXT or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. QNXT is less concentrated, with 30.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QNXT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $28M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.65% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 75 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +10.52% | +12.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.54% | +16.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.1% | 13.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.1% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $12,434 | $13,419Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 30.0%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 24, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.9 years).
QNXT vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
QNXT vs VTI Performance
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QNXT returned +10.54% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, QNXT is up 10.52% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QNXT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 13.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.1% for QNXT and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QNXT charges 0.20% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QNXT currently yields 0.65% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
84.7% of QNXT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 6.0% of VTI's money is in holdings QNXT also owns.
Most of QNXT is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
60 positions in common, counted across the 71 positions we hold weights for in QNXT and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 75 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,090 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for QNXT (91.4% of the fund), and 4 for QNXT that do not appear in VTI (4.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QNXT | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 4.24% | 0.29% | 3.95% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Group Ltd. | 3.38% | 0.23% | 3.15% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 3.32% | 0.22% | 3.10% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp Company Guar 11/28 3 | 2.84% | 0.26% | 2.58% |
| BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc. | 2.82% | 0.21% | 2.61% |
| VRTXNvaesrtex Pharmaceuticals Inc | 2.53% | 0.17% | 2.36% |
| ISRGIntuitive Surgical Inc. | 2.44% | 0.17% | 2.27% |
| FTNTFortinet Inc | 2.29% | 0.14% | 2.15% |
| SBUXStarbucks Corp | 2.21% | 0.17% | 2.04% |
| ADBEAdobe Systems | 2.16% | 0.14% | 2.02% |
84.7% of QNXT is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QNXT or VTI?
QNXT has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QNXT or VTI?
Over the past year QNXT returned +10.54% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QNXT annualized +12.15% vs +16.74% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QNXT or VTI?
QNXT has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 13.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QNXT -22.1% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both QNXT and VTI?
QNXT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QNXT and VTI?
84.7% of QNXT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 6.0% of VTI's is in holdings QNXT also owns. They hold 60 positions in common, counted across the 71 positions we hold weights for in QNXT and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, QNXT or VTI?
QNXT yields 0.65% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than QNXT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. QNXT is less concentrated, with 30.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.