QQHG vs VTI
Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQHG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $13M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.27% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 248 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +9.85% | +13.12% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.55% | +20.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -6.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 7, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
QQHG vs VTI Performance
Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQHG returned +17.55% while VTI returned +20.82%. Year to date, QQHG is up 9.85% versus a gain of 13.12% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 11.0% for QQHG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.2% for QQHG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQHG charges 0.45% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQHG currently yields 0.27% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
QQHG and VTI share 194 holdings out of 2811 unique holdings combined, representing a 49.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQHG or VTI?
QQHG has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQHG or VTI?
Over the past year QQHG returned +17.55% vs +20.82% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QQHG annualized +24.11% vs +8.08% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQHG or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 11.0% for QQHG. Worst drawdown: QQHG -6.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both QQHG and VTI?
QQHG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between QQHG and VTI?
QQHG and VTI share 194 common holdings with a 49.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2811 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQHG or VTI?
QQHG yields 0.27% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.