QQJG vs VTI
Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQJG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $7M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.69% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 84 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -11.31% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.29% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.04% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 27, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
QQJG vs VTI Performance
Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQJG returned +3.29% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, QQJG is down 11.31% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, QQJG compounded at +10.04% per year against +21.83% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +0.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQJG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.2% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.8% for QQJG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQJG charges 0.20% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQJG currently yields 0.69% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
QQJG and VTI share 61 holdings out of 2815 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQJG or VTI?
QQJG has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQJG or VTI?
Over the past year QQJG returned +3.29% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), QQJG annualized +0.79% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQJG or VTI?
QQJG has been the more volatile fund at 19.2% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QQJG -36.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both QQJG and VTI?
QQJG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between QQJG and VTI?
QQJG and VTI share 61 common holdings with a 2.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2815 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQJG or VTI?
QQJG yields 0.69% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.